ALERTPAY-- sistem de plata online

luni, 17 decembrie 2007

Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi digital camera specifications




Canon EOS 400D / Digital Rebel XTi



Announced 24-Aug-06
Format
SLR
Price (street)
$563.76
Also known as
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Release Status

Max resolution
3888 x 2592
Low resolution
2816 x 1880, 1936 x 1288
Image ratio w:h
3:2
Effective pixels
10.1 million
Sensor photo detectors
10.5 million
Sensor size
22.2 x 14.8 mm
Sensor type
CMOS
Colour filter array
RGB
Sensor manufacturer
Canon
ISO rating
100, 200, 400, 800, 1600
Zoom wide (W)
n/a
Zoom tele (T)
n/a
Digital zoom
No
Image stabilization
No
Auto Focus
Yes
Manual Focus
Yes
Auto focus type
Multi-BASIS TTL, 9 focus points (EOS 30D AF)
Normal focus range

Macro focus range
n/a
White balance override
6 positions & manual preset
Aperture range
n/a
Min shutter
30 sec + Bulb
Max shutter
1/4000 sec
Built-in Flash
Yes, pop-up
Flash guide no.
12 m (39.3 ft) @ ISO 100
External flash
Yes, hot-shoe, E-TTL II
Flash modes
Auto, On, Red-eye reduction, Off
Exposure compensation
-2 to +2 EV in 1/3 EV or 1/2 EV steps
Metering
35 area eval, center weighted, partial
Aperture priority
Yes
Shutter priority
Yes
Focal length multiplier
1.6
Lens thread
Canon EOS EF, EF-S mount
Continuous Drive
Yes, 3.0 fps, 27 JPEG or 10 RAW frames
Movie Clips
No
Remote control
E3 connector, InfraRed
Self-timer
10 sec (2 sec with mirror lock-up)
Timelapse recording
Yes, by USB cable and PC
Orientation sensor
Yes
Storage types
Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage included
None
Uncompressed format
RAW
Compressed format
JPEG (EXIF 2.21)
Quality Levels
Fine, Normal
Viewfinder
TTL
LCD
2.5 "
LCD Pixels
230,000
Video out
Yes
USB
Yes, 2.0
Firewire (IEEE 1394)
No
Battery / Charger
Yes
Battery
Canon 720mAh Li-Ion & Charger
Weight (inc. batteries)
556 g (19.6 oz)
Dimensions
127 x 94 x 65 mm (5 x 3.7 x 2.6 in)
Notes

Resolution Chart

Colour Patches
CIBER to Present at UBS Global Technology and Services Conference

CIBER, Inc. (NYSE: CBR) is a pure-play international system integration consultancy with superior value-priced services and reliable delivery for both private and government sector clients. CIBER’s services are offered globally on a project- or strategic-staffing basis, in both custom and enterprise resource planning (ERP) package environments, and across all technology platforms, operating systems and infrastructures. Founded in 1974 and headquartered in Greenwood Village, Colo., CIBER now serves client businesses from over 60 U.S. offices, 25 European offices and seven offices in Asia/Pacific. Operating in 18 countries, with more than 8,000 employees and annual revenue over $1 billion, CIBER and its IT specialists continuously build and upgrade clients’ systems to “competitive advantage status.” CIBER is included in the Russell 2000 Index and the S&P Small Cap 600 Index. CIBER, ALWAYS ABLE. www.ciber.com
Forward-Looking and Cautionary StatementsStatements contained in this release may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. CIBER undertakes neither intention nor obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. CIBER and the CIBER logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of CIBER, Inc.

The Year of Desktop Linux

We caution any investor from getting too enthusiastic about the impact of the “new new” thing. The impact of inertia, and the sophistication of technological solutions, often overwhelms the apparent benefit of the new solution. The new solution often either takes much, much longer to have an impact, or it never really takes hold.
We advise looking for companies with significant market share and a proven ability to defend their position with innovation and continual enhancements. In fact, we think that the rise of consumer appliances such as laptops and cell phones may favor the most established large cap companies, despite their proprietary devices and solutions.
We think that open source computing offers an excellent example as to the limited impact on market leaders of disruptive technologies. Open source computing remains one of the more interesting potentialities in the information technology market. Unfortunately, it has remained a potentiality rather than a major force in several markets despite ebullient prognostications.
At the turn of the century, we thought that Linux could make significant inroads on the desktop software market and erode Microsoft’s dominance. Back in 2001, we noted in this column that Linux had failed to gain share in the desktop/laptop market, which we attributed to the dominance of Microsoft Office and the lack of complete hardware compatibility. In 2002, we loaded a copy of Red Hat 8.0 with a new user interface and a number of software applications at home. While it had decent hardware compatibility, we still had problems getting the sound card to work. As a “newbie,” we also were frustrated at the limited customization options of the interface using just a mouse to change the options.
Based on this limited experience, we didn’t think that the impact of Linux on the desktop would be significant at first; however, we thought that the sophistication of this open source solution would increase and its relative attractiveness would rise over time. In short, we thought that the gap between Microsoft Windows would diminish and that Linux’s market share on the desktop would rise.
We had no explicit timeframe based on any detailed analyses, but we thought that Linux’s desktop impact could be felt in three to five years, mostly via a continuing reduction to Microsoft’s growth rate in revenues. The selection of Linux as a desktop solution in high profile organizations such as the Munich city government lent some credence to this thought; governments and emerging markets should have great incentives to shift to a low cost alternative. Market research firms supported this thesis and were predicting significant desktop share gains for Linux.
Whoops. Over the past five to six years, we have probably been right in terms of the closing of the gap between the two desktop solutions. The desktop interface has gone through several generations. OpenOffice seems to be a perfectly viable office productivity suite, and there are many other effective applications available. However, Linux still suffers from modest hardware incompatibilities and a far more limited selection of desktop applications. These failings are evidenced by the perennial failure of the “Year of Desktop Linux” to appear. Market shares seem mired in the low single digits.
More important, perhaps, is the attitude of the development community towards unsophisticated users. In 2004, we read an excellent article by Eric Raymond entitled “The Luxury of Ignorance: An Open-Source Horror Story.” His argument that the Linux development community fails to consider the user’s point of view struck a chord with us. In it, he effectively demonstrated how an archetypal Aunt Tillie would run screaming from her attempt to use Linux. The presence of hundreds of different Linux distributions and at least two different graphical user interfaces seems to support this; the software seems to be developer/enthusiast-oriented rather than mainstream user-oriented.
In the meantime, proprietary operating systems have prospered. The real gains in the desktop have been by Apple, a premium-priced, proprietary vendor. Microsoft has not failed to prosper, even in emerging markets, despite the advent of an overhauled operating system in Vista and a radically different interface in Office 2007. In the smartphone market, Windows Mobile, the Blackberry and Nokia’s Symbian dominate. Apple’s iPhone is the latest splash and is a closed system. Despite all the hoopla over Google’s Android open source software stack, we are skeptical that open source will make real inroads into the smartphone market.
So where does this leave us regarding the Year of the Desktop Linux? Well, in about three to five years we think that… seriously, we do think that open source can play a significant role in many areas, but if history is a guide, well-packaged complete solutions should continue to dominate the consumer technology market.

joi, 13 decembrie 2007

Tech stocks should lead the rebound

If you think the economy is going to bounce back from the current slowdown before next spring, as I do, then the natural question is which stocks will lead the market recovery.

There's a strong argument that big growth stocks - and particularly the shares of technology companies - will figure prominently among the next crop of market leaders.

In fact, tech stocks have been outperforming the rest of the market for some time. They may have been getting hammered for the past few weeks. But over the past six months, they've outpaced the S&P 500 by about eight percentage points.

And the fact is, many tech stocks are still relatively cheap. They greatly underperformed the market during the tech wreck from 2000 to 2002. And despite a bit of a comeback in 2003, their price/earnings ratios remained low for such fast-growing companies - even before the most recent selloff.

Fewer worries

The argument for the group isn't just statistical. It's true that the P/Es of big growth stocks are at least 15 percent below their historical averages, while value stocks are above their norms.

But what's more important is that tech, in particular, isn't directly exposed to many of today's biggest problems.

Unlike financial services, tech stocks aren't especially affected by falling home prices and defaults on mortgage-backed investments.

In addition, many tech companies carry little debt, so they aren't threatened by tighter credit conditions.

And in contrast to many industrial and transportation companies, tech isn't particularly vulnerable to soaring oil prices - in some cases it actually benefits. The quest to make chips more energy-efficient, as opposed to simply faster, is a big driver of growth in the semiconductor industry. Software firms, meanwhile, are labor-intensive, not energy-intensive. The power they need to tap is brainpower.

Technology companies are also better positioned than many mature businesses to maintain earnings growth if high oil prices start pushing up inflation. Technological innovators typically have more freedom to set prices than do makers of most consumer goods (who can say how much an iPhone should cost?). And because high-tech production typically gets cheaper over time, companies can absorb inflation simply by cutting their product prices more slowly than their manufacturing costs decline.

None of these advantages would matter if the industry's fundamentals were deteriorating. But prospects for many tech companies were visibly improving before the latest economic troubles hit.

After years of hoarding cash, businesses were again making capital investments.

And consumers have been spending on gadgetry even if they're cutting back in other areas such as home improvement.

What to buy

Tech stocks remain volatile and would probably be hurt disproportionately if the economy deteriorated further. So it makes most sense to add such stocks little by little to your portfolio - and it's crucial to diversify as much as you can.

The easiest way to do that is by putting money into exchange-traded funds that focus specifically on tech stocks.

Two prime examples are the Technology Select SPDR (XLK (Charts), which I own, and iShares Dow Jones U.S. Technology (IYW (Charts).

In addition, two of the technology stocks in the Sivy 70 look like particularly good opportunities.

Intel, the world's leading producer of microprocessors, has enjoyed a turnaround this year. Earnings for the third quarter were up 43%, beating analysts' estimates.

The chief reason has been better than expected growth in personal-computer sales, which have risen about two percentage points faster than forecasters anticipated. Much of this growth is coming from overseas.

Two other factors are contributing to Intel's superior performance. The company has slashed costs, reducing the number of employees by more than 8% this year. That could save $2 billion in 2007 and another $1 billion in 2008.

Intel (Charts, Fortune 500) has also been making gains in its perpetual, fiercely competitive struggle with No. 2 producer Advanced Micro Devices, which is now losing money. As AMD (Charts, Fortune 500) struggles, Intel should cash in big for several years.

Corning, which I added to the Sivy 70 in September, continues to offer high potential growth in its three major businesses.

Liquid crystal display panels, used for computers and large-screen televisions, have been the fastest grower over the past few years. And the outlook remains positive, with sales gains projected at 30 percent a year and costs slowly coming down.

Optical fiber, the product that made Corning (Charts, Fortune 500) such a hot stock during the late 1990s, went through several bad years because telephone and cable-TV companies seriously overbuilt. But as that excess is used up, demand is rebounding, helped by new products such as bendable, high-capacity cable.

Corning's third business, high-tech emissions controls, especially for truck engines, is small but could potentially be quite profitable as an environmental play.

After reporting great third-quarter earnings, Corning has been fairly cautious in its earnings forecast. But last week, the company raised its projections for the current quarter. And both stocks are projected to grow at an annual average of 15 percent or more over the next five years.

miercuri, 12 decembrie 2007

Sony DSC-T2 digital camera specifications

Sony DSC-T2
Image Sony DSC-T2
More information
Announced 24-Oct-07
All Sony products
Discussion
Sony Talk Forum
Find related discussion
Owners opinions
(Overall rating: 4.2)(Overall rating: 4.2)(Overall rating: 4.2)(Overall rating: 4.2)(Overall rating: 4.2)

Read owners opinions (1)
Post / Edit your opinion
Support this site by
purchasing from our
affiliate merchants
Format Ultra Compact
Price (street)
$348.69
Also known as
Release Status
Click for help Max resolution 3264 x 2448
Click for help Low resolution 3264 x 2176, 1920 x 1080, 2592 x 1944, 640 x 480
Click for help Image ratio w:h 4:3, 3:2, 16:9
Click for help Effective pixels 8.08 million
Click for help Sensor photo detectors 8.29 million
Click for help Sensor size 1/2.5 "
Click for help Sensor type CCD
Click for help Colour filter array RGB
Click for help Sensor manufacturer Sony
Click for help ISO rating Auto, 80, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200
Click for help Zoom wide (W) 38 mm
Click for help Zoom tele (T) 114 mm (3 x)
Click for help Digital zoom Yes, 6x
Click for help Image stabilization Yes, Lens
Click for help Auto Focus Yes
Click for help Manual Focus No
Click for help Auto focus type TTL
Click for help Normal focus range 50 cm
Click for help Macro focus range 8 cm
Click for help White balance override 7 positions
Click for help Aperture range F3.5 - F4.5
Click for help Min shutter 1 sec
Click for help Max shutter 1/1000 sec
Built-in Flash Yes
Flash guide no. 3.2 m (10.4 ft) (Auto ISO)
External flash No
Flash modes Auto, Red-Eye reduction, On, Off, Slow Sync
Click for help Exposure compensation -2 to +2 EV in 1/3 EV Steps
Click for help Metering Multi-Segment, Center weighted, Spot
Click for help Aperture priority No
Click for help Shutter priority No
Click for help Focal length multiplier
Lens thread No
Click for help Continuous Drive Yes, 2 fps
Movie Clips Yes, 640 x 480 (30/16.6 fps), 320 x 240, 8.3 fps
Remote control No
Self-timer 2 or 10 sec
Click for help Timelapse recording No
Orientation sensor No
Click for help Storage types Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo + Internal
Click for help Storage included 4 GB Internal
Click for help Uncompressed format No
Click for help Compressed format JPEG (EXIF 2.21)
Click for help Quality Levels Standard
Click for help Viewfinder No
Click for help LCD 2.7 " Touch screen
Click for help LCD Pixels 230,000
Click for help Video out Yes
Click for help USB Yes
Click for help Firewire (IEEE 1394) No
Click for help Battery / Charger Yes
Click for help Battery InfoLithium (NP-BD1) & charger
Weight (inc. batteries) 156 g (5.5 oz)
Dimensions 87 x 57 x 20 mm (3.4 x 2.2 x 0.8 in)
Notes
Resolution Chart
Colour Patches